The herd isnt the problem
Take it apart for relationships and make it about jobs
You are “the one”
Looks matter, but looks is not what gets you laid
You and the herd
The limits on your mind
The stockholm codependent approval seeking syndrome
What are your chances of hitting a homerun?
Nostradormouse in reply to rocelot
Women had the pharmaceutical assistance to make a seismic discontinuous break with the cultural scripts derived from biological determinism half a century ago.
All that lovely Dr. Greer could come up with at the time was a demand for more and better orgasms. Even the Spice Girls, who were in a position to concisely articulate the aspirations of an entire gender and generation, could only identify their endgame as ‘Zigazigah’
This article crystalises my underlying ‘beef’ with Feminism. It has no underlying philosophical or critical premise. “Women are human beings too” just doesn’t cut it.
The culture hasn’t figured out what to do with fertile women who aren’t having kids, so women now get a free pass.
They [Swithers - apex alpha females] have done surprisingly little with a change which makes us almost a different species. No observation. No derivation of theory. No experimental evidence reproducible or otherwise. I am disappointed.
http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/marriage-is-an-obsolete-technology-and-so-are-women/#comment-169988
So I want to stretch your framework by redefining ‘apex alpha females’. These are the gals that should be giving the herd its lofty goals, it’s direction beyond ‘you are exactly the same as men (except better in suitably vague terms) you go girls and zigazigah’. But if any apex-alpha-females exist, they are failing to deliver the requisite philosophy. (To explain my departure from your framework; I would argue that Maggie Thatcher was effectively a non-penis-wielding apex-alpha-male).
Take it apart for relationships and make it about jobs
You are “the one”
Looks matter, but looks is not what gets you laid
You and the herd
The limits on your mind
The stockholm codependent approval seeking syndrome
What are your chances of hitting a homerun?
Nostradormouse in reply to rocelot
Women had the pharmaceutical assistance to make a seismic discontinuous break with the cultural scripts derived from biological determinism half a century ago.
All that lovely Dr. Greer could come up with at the time was a demand for more and better orgasms. Even the Spice Girls, who were in a position to concisely articulate the aspirations of an entire gender and generation, could only identify their endgame as ‘Zigazigah’
This article crystalises my underlying ‘beef’ with Feminism. It has no underlying philosophical or critical premise. “Women are human beings too” just doesn’t cut it.
The culture hasn’t figured out what to do with fertile women who aren’t having kids, so women now get a free pass.
They [Swithers - apex alpha females] have done surprisingly little with a change which makes us almost a different species. No observation. No derivation of theory. No experimental evidence reproducible or otherwise. I am disappointed.
http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/marriage-is-an-obsolete-technology-and-so-are-women/#comment-169988
So I want to stretch your framework by redefining ‘apex alpha females’. These are the gals that should be giving the herd its lofty goals, it’s direction beyond ‘you are exactly the same as men (except better in suitably vague terms) you go girls and zigazigah’. But if any apex-alpha-females exist, they are failing to deliver the requisite philosophy. (To explain my departure from your framework; I would argue that Maggie Thatcher was effectively a non-penis-wielding apex-alpha-male).