https://usa-girls.jouwstartonline.nl/
https://usa-girls.toplinkjes.com/
https://usa-girls.handigestart.nl/
https://usa-girls.sellerconnect.de/
https://usa-girls.koalahilfe.de/
https://usa-girls.jougids.nl/
https://usa-girls.vindhier.com/
https://usa-girls.vindnu.com/
https://usa-girls.linkmolen.nl/
156
BuenaVista says:
May 13, 2014 at 3:06 pm
Deti, #137:
The more I think about it, the less I can support your #7.
Unfortunately I must be anecdotal, in a couple of ways, and offer a question.
A: there is, today, a quasi-TFT environment. It is online dating. From the safety of an internet handle and a wireless router, women (today) offer IOIs that they never offer in person. What do I know if I receive an OKC IOI? Well, it means that the odds of being offered sex on the first date are 50/50, and on the second date? 90+%.
I’m no alpha, but I have a few virtues. Yet most men regard online dating as the last ditch attempt saloon, because it’s so inefficient. My profile is probably active two weeks out of 12, because that is all the dating activity I can handle. Goodness knows what would happen if all women, as a condition of being online, HAD to submit IOIs in a TFT compliant fashion.
So if it becomes socially acceptable for women to openly flirt in a lounge or airport gate, as it is online, why wouldn’t the same dynamic occur — the same 20/80 phenomenon that OKC documented? Only now, as BB noted, it will be even more efficient for a playa swordsman to crucify womenkind on a penis of gold? I think TFT, as outlined, superfuels hookup culture. This does not raise betas up, it funnels more women more efficiently to apex males. Remember, women won’t be shamed, nuked or punished for showing interest in a man; every man in the top 20 is suddenly going to have Don Draper options.
https://usa-girls.toplinkjes.com/
https://usa-girls.handigestart.nl/
https://usa-girls.sellerconnect.de/
https://usa-girls.koalahilfe.de/
https://usa-girls.jougids.nl/
https://usa-girls.vindhier.com/
https://usa-girls.vindnu.com/
https://usa-girls.linkmolen.nl/
156
BuenaVista says:
May 13, 2014 at 3:06 pm
Deti, #137:
The more I think about it, the less I can support your #7.
Unfortunately I must be anecdotal, in a couple of ways, and offer a question.
A: there is, today, a quasi-TFT environment. It is online dating. From the safety of an internet handle and a wireless router, women (today) offer IOIs that they never offer in person. What do I know if I receive an OKC IOI? Well, it means that the odds of being offered sex on the first date are 50/50, and on the second date? 90+%.
I’m no alpha, but I have a few virtues. Yet most men regard online dating as the last ditch attempt saloon, because it’s so inefficient. My profile is probably active two weeks out of 12, because that is all the dating activity I can handle. Goodness knows what would happen if all women, as a condition of being online, HAD to submit IOIs in a TFT compliant fashion.
So if it becomes socially acceptable for women to openly flirt in a lounge or airport gate, as it is online, why wouldn’t the same dynamic occur — the same 20/80 phenomenon that OKC documented? Only now, as BB noted, it will be even more efficient for a playa swordsman to crucify womenkind on a penis of gold? I think TFT, as outlined, superfuels hookup culture. This does not raise betas up, it funnels more women more efficiently to apex males. Remember, women won’t be shamed, nuked or punished for showing interest in a man; every man in the top 20 is suddenly going to have Don Draper options.